WATCHMEN

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
 

Topic: How would we feel about a Group 4?

Page 1 of 1  sorted by
Xinika the Omnispawna
Status: Offline
Posts: 2184
Date:

How would we feel about a Group 4?

Permalink Closed

/Discussion

This group would supposedly be self reliant but also have good players for interchangeable groups



-- Edited by Shin on Saturday 28th of December 2013 12:56:55 PM

__________________

Everyday is a day to celebrate

Manhattan
Status: Offline
Posts: 643
Date:
Permalink Closed

Are these the people from Bane?



__________________

On your deathbed, you will not wish you played more video games.

Cheetah Defender
Status: Offline
Posts: 247
Date:
Permalink Closed

As long as they are self reliant I have no issue with having a group 4



__________________
Watchman
Status: Offline
Posts: 86
Date:
Permalink Closed
I'm down with having 4 groups. Are we talking about that mass batch of transfers or are we talking about organizing people sitting on the sidelines?

If it's the latter, I'd like to know who is interested in raiding that is currently not in a group so I can get down to organizing it and getting it off the ground.

__________________
Xinika the Omnispawna
Status: Offline
Posts: 2184
Date:
Permalink Closed
We're talking about a local group that expresses interest in joining. They need guidance and would like to intermingle with our different groups to get experience so that their group can stand on their own.

__________________

Everyday is a day to celebrate

Watchman
Status: Offline
Posts: 86
Date:
Permalink Closed
There are a lot of people who don't need gear from coil anymore; I think we could probably move people around so that new people can get experience with each turn.

Example: for turns 1-4, group 1 trades 1 dps and 1 healer, group 2 trades 1 tank, group 3 trades 1 dps. This way, each of the groups could still reliably clear the easy turns and group 4 can get some people experienced in the fights. And if the people traded to group 4 for the week don't clear 1-4, it wont matter to them because they don't need the loot. This would obviously be entirely voluntary.

If group 4 wants to make progression on their own, then this shouldn't happen. I'm just thinking about possibilities.

__________________
Manhattan
Status: Offline
Posts: 643
Date:
Permalink Closed

As long as the first 3 groups are in a strong position I don't see any problem with it adding a fourth, especially if it's a self contained group.



__________________

On your deathbed, you will not wish you played more video games.

Page 1 of 1  sorted by
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.



Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard